הרב מאיר פנחסי

Question

Is there an obligation to fulfill the deceased’s will if it is not valid according to Halacha?

Answer

If the will conflicts with Halacha, even by the slightest departure from an established custom or a trace of prohibition, one should not heed the deceased’s instructions. However, if the will does not conflict with Halacha but was simply not executed properly—for example, no kinyan was made and the like—one should heed the deceased’s instructions in order to bring him satisfaction, even though the heirs cannot be compelled to do so.

Sources and Reasoning:

In the Shulchan Aruch (Laws of a Gift Made by a Shechiv MeRa, siman 252, סעיף 2):
It is a mitzvah to fulfill the words of the deceased, even if a healthy person gave instructions and then died, provided that he had already entrusted [the property] to a third party for this purpose. The Rema writes in his gloss: However, if it had been in his possession previously and not for this purpose, or if it came into his possession after the will, this does not fall under the mitzvah to fulfill the words of the deceased. It is evident that the Shulchan Aruch rules in accordance with Rabbeinu Tam, that there is no obligation to fulfill the deceased’s words where it was not done in accordance with Halacha—namely, if it was not deposited with a third party during his lifetime.

The Sema and the Shach, however, raised a difficulty from the Ritva, whose words are cited by the Beit Yosef: one who swore or vowed to give a certain amount to another person, and died without giving it, his heirs are exempt, and this does not fall under the mitzvah to fulfill the words of the deceased. The Sema and the Shach (ibid.) questioned this, for it implies that even where he did not deposit it with a third party for this purpose, since he instructed his heirs to give it, we say that there is a mitzvah to fulfill the words of the deceased. The Maharshal?d”am (Yoreh De’ah, siman 203) writes that the entire dispute between Rabbeinu Tam and the Ramban concerns whether one may compel fulfillment of the deceased’s words; however, all agree that there is a mitzvah to heed them, in order to bring repose to the deceased’s spirit. See also Shut Sho’el U’Meishiv—Netanzon (first edition, third series, 157), who discusses this matter at length.

Nevertheless, where the will entails a prohibition or even a trace of prohibition, certainly one is not commanded to heed the deceased’s instructions (siman 538). See also Beit Yosef (Yoreh De’ah, siman 376). Even regarding a matter of Rabbinic custom, one should not heed his instructions; see Shut Sho’el U’Meishiv, first edition (Netanzon, third series, siman 157).

 

 

This response was translated automatically from Hebrew and has not yet been reviewed by a person. Therefore, it may contain inaccuracies and should not be considered a definitive reference.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PLEASE NOTE*

Attention: You should not learn from one case to another, each case must be analyzed individually. Generally speaking, it's always best to have contact with a Rabbi in person, not just virtual contact. Note that where there is a local Rabbi("Mara Deatra"), one should ask him. The answers are under the responsibility of the rabbi who responded, and not under the responsibility of the website and/or the Head of the Institution.

Advertise Here!
All proceeds are sacred To the Birkat Avraham organization. Also excellent charity, Advertising is also profitable for your business.

Didn't find an Answer?

Ask The Rabbi

Share us for friends

Last Articles

You may interested

Smart Search Within the Site ×
Ask us to pray for you!

Contact Us

Office

צור קשר

מזכירות: